Theorem R

Hey folks,
Here’s what’s been happening since last time:

A few weeks ago, I posted two videos (link) on Youtube to start a farm near Portland Oregon. Then I started writing a script for a video about the farm budget to try to raise funds online. As I was writing, I thought, if that worked, then what, and if that worked, then what and so on. Below are some sketches from this.

 

I proposed a goal to sell a hundred units of produce each week during June next summer. Then two hundred units each week during July. And three hundred units each week during August. I offered these sales goals, to justify the 1000 unit per month request.

Each season, I will request farm provisions in this amount, regardless of the outcome of the farm. This would ensure farm stock would be supported. The farm would grow and likely, eventually produce an amount of sales in excess of the provisions.

STOCK TO SALES RATIO

To express this idea using formulas, I writ a theorem that shows a .85 stock to sales ratio. This allows for an appreciating stock value with increasing sales. The basic formula is below:

 

Where R = living provisions per hour

Formula applied to different R values (link)

If the farm were provided with:
2.70 units / hour… stock : sales = 4.38 : 3.88   (1.13)
1.38 units / hour….stock: sales = 2.33 : 2.7      (.85)
1 units / hour………stock : sales = 2.63 : 2.0     (1.32)

In comparison to the other R values here, (R=1.38) provides a favorable stock to sales ratio of .85. The farm can maintain a higher rate of efficiency, as compared to the higher (R=2.7) and lower (R=1) value.

When R = 1.38, the farm could experience an increase of stock value at a rate of 2.33, and increase in sales at a rate of 2.7.

1.38 / hour… 33/day…. 1000 / month.

In addition to the monthly allowance, this farm could follow a strategy that looks like this:

• Year 1 we value stock
• Year 2 and each year after, we value sales, until sales exceed stock
• When sales exceed stock, we shift values back to stock. And each succeeding year, we value stock over sales.
• Farm stock seems it could increase at a rate of (2.33 annually) and sales could increase at a rate of (2.7 annually).

Year 1, Year 2, Year N formulas 

Year 1, Year 2, Year N stock and sales projections

 

This seems possible because nature grows at a steady rate. A speed limit. These formulas show a reasonable speed limit could be measured at 1.38 units per hour, or one over phi squared.

 

 

BRAVITY = GRAVITY

It seems this theorem has applications in addition to rendering a healthy stock to sales ratio. Specifically, this theorem proposes a shift in how we could view gravity. Instead of gravity being a downward force, this theorem proposes it is an upward force. In place of -9.8m/s2 downward, it may be 1.38units/units of time upward. This theorem proposes to shift from log(10) to log(e).

“In mathematics, the logarithm [or log] is the inverse function to exponentiation,” (wikipedia).

On the image below are three curved lines, each at a different log value. In time,

• Log(2) goes exponential
• Log(e) goes to 2.7
• Log(10) goes to 1

A log (10) world, we could say, experiences acceleration and deceleration often. We’re either way ahead or way behind. After a long enough time, our resources barely meet our needs, log(10)–> 1.

Log(e) provides an inverse function to exponentiation. This enables us to view the world from a more reasonable vantage point, a cerebrated world view. After enough time, resources seem they could sufficiently meet and exceed our needs log(e)–> 2.7.

 

DENSITY, INTEGRITY, LIGHT, SOUND, BANDWIDTH, SITE

 

This theorem seems to provide expressions also of earth’s density (D) based on the value of the radius of a sphere, earth’s integrity (V) based on the log and length of the R value, how light (L) enters a spectrum, how sound waves (S) merge with light and form bandwidth (b). And how a log of bandwidth, makes site (T) or land. Here’s a summary of these findings:

Acceleration of bravity    1/(phi squared)

Bravitational constant      (1/(phi cubed*r)

Density                            (3(phi cubed)r) / 4pi

Speed of light                  Loge (r)

Speed of sound              -Loge (r)

Bandwidth                      1/(r squared) + r/(phi squared) (visible + invisible)

Site                                  Loge (bandwidth)

The stock and sales formulas listed above applied these formulas:

STOCK = Bravity + Density + Light + Sound + Band + Site (everything that grows on the farm)

SALES = Integrity (what you sell) + Ray (farm provisions at 1.38 units/hour)

Sales + farm provisions… these units work together in tandem. Farm support provides an extended line of credit of 1000 units each month. With this line of credit, farmers can care for farm stock and likely see favorable stock to sales ratio.

 

 

EARTH-MOON-SUN ALIGNMENT

Around the time I writ this theorem, my roommate and I started talking about the solar eclipse last year. He mentioned how odd it was that the sun and moon appeared to be exactly the same size. Shortly after this chat, I applied this formula to planetary alignment. After some searches, it seems a few things may be happening:

• Distance between the earth and moon may be equal to the distance between the moon and sun
• Moon may be moving linearly between the sun and earth
• Illumination of the moon may be light and sound passing through and around the earth showing a curved arc in the sky
• Earth may be hollow, with the south pole in a fixed position in space and the north pole rotating gyroscopically around the south pole axis.

I’m imagining something like this:

These findings pose a few thoughts:

• The sun may have a predominated position around our southern ice cap. This could be why glaciers are melting. It seems we want some shade on our base. With an earth-moon-sun alignment, the sun, it seems, wouldn’t have nearly as much time around the south pole.
• The north pole may be a rotating cone, slowly opening up.
• Maybe our day could look like dawn all day, with a solar eclipse bathing all parts of the earth with corona. If we can find concurrency in an earth-moon-sun position, maybe our intentions alone could align planets.

 

OED Oxford-English-Dictionary

I started writing these propositions in a manner like this to share, then I found myself looking up series of words in the dictionary. I often use the Oxford-English-Dictionary, or OED, as a reference guide. The OED is deep and dense. It seems to be a tightly-linked web with centuries of species, cultures, languages, migrations, conquests. It is what has remained on the field after centuries of battle.

The OED seems to be a story of civilization without a storyline. Surely, the OED, as any other cultural book, is written from the perspective of the “victors” you could say. However, it seems to have integrity… it recognizes past events, creatures, cultures as having happened. And thus they are part of the story of this planet.

I’m beginning to think that things don’t “go away” in the cosmos. Indigenous people may have found it difficult to live on earth in recent times. But they may be out there, along with countless other living species, in the cue, waiting for their chance to re-inhabit.

I’m also beginning to wonder if our given birth names provide a road map to learn where we came from and insight as to what we’re supposed to do. Maybe we are each on a mission from a far off place. Maybe part of our mission is about our name and part is about how we describe ourselves.

Words matter. They did before. They do now.
Names matter. They did before. They do now.
Missions matter. They did before. They do now.

The last few days, I’ve been diving into layers of links in the OED, finding meaningful words and associations and copying those into a new document. Words like Monad, Doyen and Bimettalism. Monad is a single unit. Sounds like monk, sounds like money… monad. Tough to pull apart a word like that. Folks have tried. Monad seems to be flanked by about every similar-sounding-syllepsis one could imagine. But Monad remains and it remains as pure and meaningful as it ever was.

I would like to write a book that brings good words back into circulation. I would like to includes our names, as representatives of the current inhabitants on earth. I would like this book to serve as a functional tool to help us work together, speak the same language and secure this place so we may blossom into a homologous cosmic flower.

Then I want to speak this language into the cosmos, and send out signals that Earth is a place where everyone has a voice and everyone gets wet. On earth, we dwell, comfortably, and adhere to a lightweight framework of protocols to ensure core values remain wholesome and modern.

 

RENDERENCE

I asked for renderence from the people to whom I pay rent. I’m out of funds. I offered to do chores around the house. Friends have helped out with food as of lately.

At the moment, I feel compelled to keep going with these written projects and further clarify this vision. Soon, I would like to register a non-profit business in Oregon, start a farm and try to lead some resemblance of a normal life.

For the next few days, I’ll keep going with this stuff and see what comes up. Thanks for reading fam
B